A few days after I arrived back in the UK I received emails
from my PhD supervisors, two fearsomely wise and effective women, noting that
Ebola was in the news a bit more and advising me to monitor the situation in
case it affects my plans to return to Liberia for my fieldwork. The trouble is, (and forgive me for the social research talk) “being in the news” is not a great quantitative
indicator of the severity of a situation.
As we all experience daily, sometimes things are “in the news” which are
all hype, and sometimes things that really should be “in the news” seem to be
forgotten. I needed to find another way
to track whether the outbreak in Liberia really was getting worse, or whether
it was just getting more attention.
From the beginning of the outbreak, the World Health
Organisation (WHO) has been tracking and providing updates about what is
happening in West Africa. I’d like to
take this moment to say what a fantastic organisation I think the WHO is – we don’t
recognise the work they do protecting life enough. Anyhow, if you take their reports monitoring
the outbreak, along with outbreak reports produced by the National Travel
Health Network and Centre (NaTHNaC), you can produce a nice little data set. The reporting has got more precise as time
has gone on, so I have taken the figures from early June to demonstrate the
trends in the numbers of cases and deaths.
So what does this tell me? Since around the 20th July the number of cases (and, therefore, deaths) seems to be rising more rapidly. But how widespread is this? The outbreak in Liberia began in a very specific area – the Foya District - in the north west of the country, and I have no reason to go there. Well, the nice people at www.medicalteams.org have shared this map, produced by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, which shows that 9 of Liberia’s 15 counties are now affected.
So, in summary, yes – it is getting worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment